Connect with us


Yes, when Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz leaves the company that he basically threw into a spinning nose dive on April 3rd, he will do so under a cloud…all due to his liberal policies.

As you will most likely remember, he made news in January when he came out loud and proud against President Trump and his temporary travel ban. The CEP, who was rumored to have been being pursued to run for the Democratic nominee for president in 2020, announced himself via an open letter that his company planned to hire 10,000 refugees all in response to President Trump’s temporary travel ban.

He announced his intention to retire in December…but now due to his controversial decision, however, what he thought would be his victory lap has turned into a nightmare instead.

In his open letter, Schultz said that Starbucks was making a “concerted effort to welcome and seek opportunities for those fleeing war, violence, persecution and discrimination. There are more than 65 million citizens of the world recognized as refugees by the United Nations, and we are developing plans to hire 10,000 of them over five years in the 75 countries around the world where Starbucks does business.”

According to the U.K. Daily Mail, Starbucks’ YouGov BrandIndex’s Buzz score — a measure of how consumers feel about a brand — dropped two-thirds between Schultz’s open letter on Jan. 29 and Feb. 13, thanks to a boycott from Trump supporters.

The Daily Mail said YouGov “noted that the data around this boycott is different because both the measures of consumers’ sentiment toward companies and their willingness to purchase from those brands are declining.”

CNBC reported that Credit Suisse reiterated its hold rating on the brand’s stock because of Schultz’s letter, saying both sales and the brand itself had suffered.

“Our work shows a sudden drop in brand sentiment following announcement of the refugee hiring initiative on Jan. 29, to flattish from a run-rate of ~+80 (on an index of -100 to +100). Net sentiment has since recovered, but has seen significant volatility in recent weeks,” Credit Suisse equity analyst Jason West wrote.

It’s easy to see why. Schultz isn’t the only person who has condescended to those who want stricter vetting by painting them as simply opposing “those fleeing war, violence, persecution and discrimination.” After all, our former president went as far as to describe them as “widows and orphans,” mocking those who had concerns about Islamic State group infiltration.

We’ve seen more than enough evidence that there are significant security concerns that need to be addressed. Consider the fact that the FBI confirmed that nearly one out of every three domestic terrorism cases it was investigating involved refugees.

Yes, a sudden drop in brand sentiment…because you serve coffee. Not life. Coffee.

They thought their brand’s addiction was enough to get them past such foolishness.

They were wrong.

Continue Reading